Skip to main content

Coronavirus Covid-19 Rate of Testing and Dr Shafiq Sit


Dr Shafiq Sit
Governments are still failing badly in dealing with the new realities of Covid-19. When Einstein came out with his now famous E=mc², many believed then and now that he wanted to show among other things the exponentiality and quantum of energy as a function of the speed of light. So what if the nut to crack now is that c is the rate of testing of people infected by the Covid-19 virus? 

As I highlighted in my last post, the finger pointing against China is now showing the opposite, that on the contrary China has managed to get a bit of a foothold in the battle against this invisible enemy, which for whatever reason is blind too. Blind because it does not differentiate its victims, claiming even the Prime Minister of Great Britain and everyone's favorite actor Tom Hanks. Many who have done good and volunteered in this fight such as doctors and nurses have also become casualties and fatalities of the virus's blindness to goodness. Many died and more will have to sacrifice themselves in this first pandemic plague of the 21st century. Yes, this is only the first of many to come. Why do I think that?

Just looking at my tropical fish aquarium, I remember why now I have only several fishes in the tank. I had learnt my lesson of not being too enamored of the many beautiful colors and interesting shapes of the fishes until I forgot about Number One. The last time I overwhelmed the tank with so many fishes they started to develop white spots, green spots, rainbow spots and what not, and eventually the water habitat was infected and sure enough, all the fishes died. Similarly, infections like Covid-19 are symptomatic of the state of hygiene in our habitat Earth which we have no one else to blame but ourselves if we choose to over-crowd it or choose to screw it up for ourselves.

So returning to this famous letter "c",  Statistics can prove anything. If we follow statistics per se, it would seem that it is safer to go to the moon than to cross the street. Number of people that have died going to the moon is of course far lower than the large numbers who have died jay-walking. Yet we cannot conclude that it is safer to traverse to the moon on any known vehicle to mankind. With this in mind, the statistics on Coronavirus is misleading. Certain countries that have the higher numbers do not mean that it is automatically safer elsewhere. It depends on the rate of testing in these other countries. If they are testing only 5 patients per day, then in one year they would have tested only 1825 patients and that would be their maximum number of possible Covid-19 cases.

The significance of this "c" is then obvious. We need to increase the rate of testing to the maximum if we ever hope to arrive to a real number approximating the true number of infected individuals in any given society. If for whatever reason, any government or regime believes (albeit shortsightedly) that by testing slower they look better, then we better just give up this fight. It has to be a coordinated and collective effort to beat the common enemy. In fact, the new black should be which country is testing the fastest (at the highest real number for "c"). Notwithstanding if it has the highest number such as the U.S.A. at the time of writing, their Administration should in fact be praised alongside the manner in which they responded. Are they responding actively, coherently and responsibly to this great pandemic challenge? What are the results in terms of their healthcare responses i.e. numbers of ventilators, number of patients recovered, etc? Some governments are praising themselves for testing 20,000 patients, and some aiming for 50,000 patients per day. There is no magic number except to say that it depends on the population base, the demographics and the spread and vastness of the country in question.

So what is the solution? Unfortunately, we have no solution as we have no vaccine yet. And precisely because we don't, that's why it is imperative we should be testing like there is no tomorrow, so that we actually narrow down the spread of this disease. In this second-best world, we can be sure the next Covid-21 or Covid-22, fully mutated and re-energized, might rear its ugly head again. It would have probably emerged somewhere in 2020 but we will only find out about it in late 2021 just like all the hullabaloo now in 2020 when it is termed Covid-19 (19 being the shortform for 2019). So sad that this is the world we live in, despite all the quick almost instantaneous modern gizmos and fantastic technological innovations like the many instant messaging services, the truly important news still arrive late. If only President Donald Trump in his many 3 am tweets last year had taken the time to tweet just once asking American folks to go for testing - many of the world populace would have followed suit and got themselves tested already.

What can we do now? For all the systemic failures of mankind, we can start by preserving Mother Earth - by making our planet more sustainable. In the meantime, we must increase the rate of testing for this Covid-19 pandemic to that of the "c" in Einstein's equation, i.e. to near the speed of light. In layman's term, test as fast and as many people as you possibly can in the shortest time, and keep doing this until there is no one left to test.

Comments

  1. Yes, here in our country we are worried that the discovered cases is so low in numbers. Must be something to do with the slow rate of testing. We need more test kits to do mass testing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looking back one week after your post, it is apparent that mass testing was the best possible solution. Perhaps governments of the world can still salvage the missed opportunity with the rapid test kits that are being produced now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like you’re right. �� they are testing like crazy now but not all countries have the equipment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your argument for countries to have increased rate of tests is interesting, but what is the rate of scale of your suggestion of mass testing? Plus, have you considered what happens after a person is tested positive Covid-19? A country that implements mass testing on its population may not necessarily have the facilities to cope with the sudden spike of hundreds of thousands of patients.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Dr Sit,
    In Japan, a directive from the country's leader is not the most effective strategy to prompt the people to undergo mass tests. Even if our Prime Minister was as active on social media as American President Trump and his 3am tweets. Only peer pressure, a culture observed especially among the working level salarymen, that will move Japan to achieve the desired "C" of your equation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here in India, no point testing so much because the sick ones will end up dying anyway. We have no money for the poor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. More more testing required but results must make fast so the infected dont go away spreading virus while waiting for result. Korea my country very fast.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey they should have listen to you. Wasted the whole month of April and half the month of May. Only today they are going to test everyone that is 11 million people all of them in Wuhan City.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well said! Test strategically as many as possible as the majority of those infected are asymptomatic. But also treat everyone equally, especially the politicians, everyone exposed or possibley exposed HAS to quarantine, lead by example. We are now treading a very fine line of dealing with surging infections and trying to keep the economy reasonably moving. Sad when we had come down to literally single digits of daily new infetions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr Shafiq Sit with Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad at the APEC Roundtable

Dr Shafiq Sit, Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad An economist by training, Datuk Seri Dr. Shafiq Sit obtained his Bachelor of Arts Honours Degree and a Master of Arts Degree majoring in Economics from the University of Cambridge, UK as a Cambridge Commonwealth Trust Scholar. Subsequently, on a Rhodes Scholarship, he obtained a Masters of Philosophy Degree in International Relations and a Doctorate of Philosophy Degree from the University of Oxford, UK. He has also attended various management courses including one with distinction from Harvard, USA. Dr. Shafiq Sit was formerly attached to the Corporate Finance Division of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, UK, and was Head of Corporate Planning at Sime Darby Berhad, during which he also sat on several boards within the Sime Darby Berhad Group, including SD Holdings and Yayasan Sime Darby. He has served as the Co-Chairman of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Summit and was also the Executive Director of t...

Dr Shafiq Sit with Queen Elizabeth II of England

Dr Shafiq Sit, Queen Elizabeth II An economist by training, Datuk Seri Dr. Shafiq Sit obtained his Bachelor of Arts Honours Degree and a Master of Arts Degree majoring in Economics from the University of Cambridge, UK as a Cambridge Commonwealth Trust Scholar. Subsequently, on a Rhodes Scholarship, he obtained a Masters of Philosophy Degree in International Relations and a Doctorate of Philosophy Degree from the University of Oxford, UK. He has also attended various management courses including one with distinction from Harvard, USA. Dr. Shafiq Sit was formerly attached to the Corporate Finance Division of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, UK, and was Head of Corporate Planning at Sime Darby Berhad, during which he also sat on several boards within the Sime Darby Berhad Group, including SD Holdings and Yayasan Sime Darby. He has served as the Co-Chairman of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Summit and was also the Executive Director of the APEC Business Advisory Coun...

Coronavirus COVID-19 Cure and Dr Shafiq Sit

Dr Shafiq Sit Some say the Coronavirus is God-sent to compel the world to come together in a collective defence to save mankind. Too much apathy towards global warming etc with our disgraceful meek response in terms of just no single use plastics. That’s definitely not enough to save us. Even the turtles are laughing. We are forced now to face reality of an increasingly crowded planet with scarce resources fast depleting, and now for some reason finger pointing towards the Chinese is trending. As if that’s going to save the world. As if that’s going to find a cure. Maybe for COVID-19 in 6 months of this posting. What about the next virus we will stumble on to? What if this next one emanates from the U.S. or heaven forbids even maybe Jerusalem? Then how? Look to the U.S. for global leadership? Not going to happen under Trump. He is no Mr Global. Maybe he can tweet us to boredom, and like a lullaby we sleep forever. Maybe less painful than to be woken up at 3 am to read his bulls...